Trainers need to design and develop the following.
- Objectives of the lesson
- Learning activities for the lesson (e.g. content, delivery mode, resources)
- Assessment tasks for the lesson
- Valid
a valid assessment assesses what it says it assesses and is undertaken in a situation that matches the workplace requirement.
i.e. if it is a practical task that you are assessing then you would request that they simulate the task for assessment not write about it. - Reliable
the methods of assessment clearly show whether the learner has achieved competence. The evidence is real, not opinions or thoughts. Another assessor would also make the same decision. - Flexible
the methods of assessment reflect the needs and circumstances of the person being assessed and the workplace. - Fair
you are fair to all those seeking assessment. No-one is disadvantaged by the methods used. The assessment methods and evidence required match with the level of the competency standard.
III Rules of Evidence
- The evidence gathered must be valid.
i.e. if you were assessing a verbal communications competency for example, you may want to see the candidate communicating with a range of different people in a variety of situations and for a number of purposes. - There must be sufficient evidence.
You need to gather enough evidence to be confident of the candidate’s ability to demonstrate competence; this will also help to ensure that the assessment is reliable (i.e. it can be replicated by another assessor). - The evidence must be authentic.
Ensure that the work is that of the candidate’s. Direct evidence is the easiest to authenticate though not always possible. - The evidence needs to be current.
It is important that any supplementary or indirect evidence is recent enough to :
• Reflect the candidate’s current skills, and
• Reflect the requirements of the current standards.
IV References and sources
ALTC Engineering and ICT statements
http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/altc_standards_ENGINEERING_090211.pdf
Aligning teaching for constructing learning, John Biggs
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id477_aligning_teaching_for_constructing_learning.pdf
Tomorrow's Professor Mailing List
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/CTL/Tomprof/index.shtml
Msg.#1138 Top Ten Workplace Issues for Faculty Members and Higher Education Professionals
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=1138
Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#849 Supporting Student Success Through Scaffolding
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=849
Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#1096 Lose the Lectures
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=1096
Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#498 The Constructivist View of Learning
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=498
Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#555 The Nature of Learning
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=555
Tomorrow's Professor Msg.#121 Tactics for Effective Questioning
http://cgi.stanford.edu/~dept-ctl/cgi-bin/tomprof/posting.php?ID=121
Questions for the revised bloom's taxonomy
Questions for the revised bloom's taxonomy
No comments:
Post a Comment